E-Book Overview
Lockwood Green Technologies, 2000 г. , 154 с. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
E-Book Content
Ironmaking Process Alternatives Screening Study Volume I: Summary Report ORE TO CONCENTRATOR IRON ORE MINE
ORE BENEFICIATION CONCENTRATOR
SLURRY PIPELINE CONCENTRATE SLURRY RECEIVING, DEWATERING
ELECTRIC POWER (50% FROM COAL, 50% FROM N.G.)
PELLET STOCKPILE
PELLET PLANT DIRECT REDUCTION PLANTS
NATURAL GAS
EAF MELTING
DRI
TO PORT
STEEL SLABS
SLAB SHIPPING
SLAB CASTER
VACUUM DEGASSING
October 2000
LG Job No. 010529.01
LMFs
NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION
DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Contents
Volume I: Ironmaking Alternative Study Executive Summary...............................................................................1
Study Scope and Methodology............................................................2
Ironmaking Process Discussion and Grouping ................................3
Discussion of Ranking Analysis ..........................................................4
Summary and Conclusions ..................................................................5
Dal\\\Da0002\01052901\common\DOE REPORT OCT 2000\Contents-Main Report.doc
Report Outline Section 1: Executive Summary 1-1:
General Discussion
1-2:
Summary Conclusions
Section 2: Study Scope and Methodology 2-1:
Study Scope 2-1.1 Introduction 2-1.2 Scope/Objective
2-2:
Methodology and Approach 2-2.1: Introduction to the MetSim Process Simulator 2-2.2: Simulation Models of Ironmaking Processes 2-2.3: Spreadsheet Mass Balances of Process Components 2-2.4: Spreadsheet Mass Balances of Ironmaking Processes
2-3:
Base Process Location 2-3.1: Base Location Assumptions 2-3.2: Location Sensitivities
2-4:
Process Capital (CAPEX) and Operating Cost (OPEX) Estimates 2-4.1 Process Capital Costs (CAPEX) 2-4.2 Process Operating Costs (OPEX)
\\Da0002\01052901\common\DOE REPORT OCT 2000\Rep