E-Book Overview
Lockwood Green Technologies, 2000 г. , 154 с. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
E-Book Content
Ironmaking Process Alternatives Screening Study Volume I: Summary Report ORE TO CONCENTRATOR IRON ORE MINE ORE BENEFICIATION CONCENTRATOR SLURRY PIPELINE CONCENTRATE SLURRY RECEIVING, DEWATERING ELECTRIC POWER (50% FROM COAL, 50% FROM N.G.) PELLET STOCKPILE PELLET PLANT DIRECT REDUCTION PLANTS NATURAL GAS EAF MELTING DRI TO PORT STEEL SLABS SLAB SHIPPING SLAB CASTER VACUUM DEGASSING October 2000 LG Job No. 010529.01 LMFs NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Contents Volume I: Ironmaking Alternative Study Executive Summary...............................................................................1 Study Scope and Methodology............................................................2 Ironmaking Process Discussion and Grouping ................................3 Discussion of Ranking Analysis ..........................................................4 Summary and Conclusions ..................................................................5 Dal\\\Da0002\01052901\common\DOE REPORT OCT 2000\Contents-Main Report.doc Report Outline Section 1: Executive Summary 1-1: General Discussion 1-2: Summary Conclusions Section 2: Study Scope and Methodology 2-1: Study Scope 2-1.1 Introduction 2-1.2 Scope/Objective 2-2: Methodology and Approach 2-2.1: Introduction to the MetSim Process Simulator 2-2.2: Simulation Models of Ironmaking Processes 2-2.3: Spreadsheet Mass Balances of Process Components 2-2.4: Spreadsheet Mass Balances of Ironmaking Processes 2-3: Base Process Location 2-3.1: Base Location Assumptions 2-3.2: Location Sensitivities 2-4: Process Capital (CAPEX) and Operating Cost (OPEX) Estimates 2-4.1 Process Capital Costs (CAPEX) 2-4.2 Process Operating Costs (OPEX) \\Da0002\01052901\common\DOE REPORT OCT 2000\Rep