E-Book Content
BY THE SAME WORD: THE INTERSECTION OF COSMOLOGY AND SOTERIOLOGY IN HELLENISTIC JUDAISM, EARLY CHRISTIANITY AND “GNOSTICISM” IN THE LIGHT OF MIDDLE PLATONIC INTERMEDIARY DOCTRINE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Ronald R. Cox, B.S., M. Div. ___________________________________ Gregory E. Sterling, Director Graduate Program in Theology Notre Dame, Indiana April 2005 UMI Number: 3171614 UMI Microform 3171614 Copyright 2005 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 BY THE SAME WORD: THE INTERSECTION OF COSMOLOGY AND SOTERIOLOGY IN HELLENISTIC JUDAISM, EARLY CHRISTIANITY AND “GNOSTICISM’ IN THE LIGHT OF MIDDLE PLATONIC INTERMEDIARY DOCTRINE Abstract By Ronald R. Cox Middle Platonism espoused an intellectual system that would explain how a transcendent supreme principle could relate to the material universe. The central aspect of this system was an intermediary, modeled after the Stoic active principle, which mediated the supreme principle’s influence to the material world while preserving its transcendence. Having similar concerns as Middle Platonism, three religious traditions from the turn of the era (Hellenistic Jewish sapientialism, early Christianity, and “Gnosticism”) appropriated Middle Platonic intermediary doctrine as a means for understanding their relationship to the Deity, to the cosmos, and to themselves. However, each of these traditions varies in their adaptation of this doctrine as a result of their distinctive understanding of creation and humanity’s place therein. In particular Hellenistic Jewish sapientialism (Philo of Alexandria and Wisdom of Solomon) espouses a holistic ontology, combining a Platonic appreciation for noetic reality with an Ronald R. Cox ultimately positive view of creation and its place in human fulfillment. Early Christians (those who speak in 1 Corinthians 8:6, Colossians 1:15-20, Hebrews 1:2-3, and the Johannine prologue) provide an eschatological twist on this ontology when the intermediary figure finds its final expression in the human Jesus Christ. On the other hand, Poimandres (CH 1) and the Apocryphon of John, both associated with the traditional rubric “gnosticism,” draw from Platonism to describe how creation is antithetical to human nature and its transcendent source. To Elaine and Hugh Gainey, Rikka and Eric Stewart, and Shelly Evans Cox ii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ............................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgments..................................................................................................... ix Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 A. The Fusion of Creation Myth and Salvation History...................................... 1 B. Identifying the Vorleben of the Christological Creation Myth ....................... 4 B.1 A Liturgical Vorleben.............................................................................. 4 B.2 A Hebraic Sapiential Vorleben................................................................ 6 B.3 A Hellenistic Jewish Vorleben ................................................................ 13 B.4 A Middle Platonic Vorleben...............................................