E-Book Content
COPYRIGHTED BY WARREN JUSTUS HUFFMAN 1952
PERSONALITY VARIATIONS AMONG MEN PREPARING TO TEACH PHYSICAL EDUCATION
BY
WARREN JUSTUS HUFFMAN B.A., Bridgewater College, 1937 A.M., University of Illinois, 1942 Bd.M., University of Illinois, 1949
THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF EDUCATION IN THE GRADUATE COLLEGE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, 1951
URBANA. ILLINOIS
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS THE GRADUATE
COLLEGE
.Ma5^_J.a51_
I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY FMTTTT.F.D
WARREN JUSTUS HUFFMAN
PERSONALITY VARIATIONS AMONG MEN PREPARING TO TEACH PHYSICAL EDUCATION
BE A C C E P T E D IN P A R T I A L F U L F I L L M E N T
THE DEGREE
OF_
OF THE REQUIREMENTS
•DQ£TOR OF EDUCATION
'
^^LJ
&
J n Charge o f 1 hesis
Head.of UTcpartment
R e^commendation c o m m e n d a t i o n co.ncurrecKj'nTV concurrecHrit
Committee
^T^v^,-^
^A trPki, g
J&S—/2ic/zeu^ t Required for doctor's degree but not for master's.
M440
on Final Examination!
FOR
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER
PAGE
I.
1
OVERVIEW OF STUDY Introduction
1
The Problem
6
Procedure
7
II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
11
Measurement of Teaching Efficiency
11
Summary
20
Measurement of Personality
21
Summary
43
RATING OF STUDENT TEACHING
44
Criterion of Teaching Efficiency
44
Construction of Rating Scales
49
Reliability and Validity of the Rating Scales . . .
51
Summary
57
ANALYSIS OF THE DATA.v
'
5g
The Central Tendencies, Deviations, and Range of Data
53
Intercorrelation of the Various Measures . . . . . .
90
Summary
92
EVALUATION OF THE STUDY
96
Limitations of the Study
96
Importance of the Study
9$
SUM'.'IARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
100
Summary Conclusions Recommendations
100 . . .
102 104
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) BIBLIOGRAPHY
PAGE lo6
APPENDICES
112
VITA
147
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer gratefully acknowledges his indebtedness to all who have helped to make this study possible and have assisted in carrying the work through to its completion: To the members of his thesis committee at the University of Illinois, Professor F. H. Finch, Chairman, Professor Glenn M. Blair, Professor Thomas K. Cureton, Jr., Professor Charles W. Odell, Professor G. T. Stafford, and Professor W. 0. Stanley for their advice and constructive criticism. To the staff members of the University of Illinois who gave assistance at various stages in the study, Professor N. L. Gage, Professor D. M. Hall, Professor C. 0. Jackson, Professor R. H. Johnson, Professor H. E. Kenney, Professor Clyde Knapp, Mr. Dale Lackey, Mr. Richard Miller, and Mr. David Misner. To Mrs. C. 0. Jackson and Mr. Oscar Adams, who helped in the construction of the Pupils' Rating Scale. Special acknowledgments are due: Professor F. H. Finch, whose guidance, wise counsel, and kind consideration made it possible to carry the study through to its completion. Professor G. T. Stafford, whose constant and never-failing interest in the problem has been a source of inspiration. Mr. Darrell E. Latham, for invaluable aid in gathering and scoring the data and in the construction of the rating scales.