E-Book Overview
The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. By David Easton. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953). Pp. — 320. A Framework for Political Analysis. By David Easton. (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965). Pp. — 143. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. By David Easton. (New York : John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1965). Pp. — 507.
An appraisal of David Easton's contribution to political science must come to terms with the self-assessment that emerges in his own writings. If we consider what Easton says, first, about the relation of the behavioral movement to earlier political science and, second, about the standing of his systems approach among behavioral approaches generally, we are led to the conclusion that his systems theory is the towering achievement of an effort, now almost 2500 years old, to develop a philosophical or scientific understanding of political life. While I shall call this high assessment into question, my estimate of Easton's work is by no means wholly unfavorable. His theory of the political system, developed in great detail over the course of two decades, stands as the most imposing theoretical structure yet to emerge from the behavioral movement in political science. No other behavioral theorist has spoken to so broad a range of issues, both methodological and theoretical. Iintend to show, however, that there are fundamental difficulties in Easton's methodology and theory which undercut his claim to have advanced decisively beyond traditional political philosophy
E-Book Content
DAVID EASTON'S POLITICAL THEORY The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science. By David Easton. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1953). Pp. xiii, 320, x. $5.95. A Framework for Political Analysis. By David Easton. (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1965). Pp. xvi, 143. $7.50. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. By David Easton. (New York : John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1965). Pp. xvi, 507. $9.95.
n appraisal of David Easton ' s contribution to political science must come to terms with the self-assessment that emerges in his own writings. If we consider what Easton says, first, about the relation of the behavioral movement to earlier political science and, second, about the standing of his systems approach among behavioral approaches generally, we are led to the conclusion that his systems theory is the towering achievement of an effort, now almost 2500 years old, to develop a philosophical or scientific understanding of political life. While I shall call this high assessment into question, my estimate of Easton ' s work is by no means wholly unfavorable. His theory of the political system, developed in great detail over the course of two decades, stands as the most imposing theoretical structure yet to emerge from the behavioral movement in political science. No other behavioral theorist has spoken to so broad a range of issues, both methodological and theoretical. I intend to show, however, that there are fundamental difficulties in Easton ' s methodology and theory which undercut his claim to have advanced decisively beyond traditional political philosophy.
A
I It is possible, on the basis of Easton ' s published writings, to distinguish three stages in the development of his thought. The first stage extends from the late 1940 ' s to about 1953, when The Political System appeared. In this preparatory stage, he succeeds in elaborating a comprehensive view of the nature of political science and political theory. He lays a methodological foundation for the construction, in the following decade, of a conceptual framework for political analysis. The second stage in his development, the
DAVID EASTON ' S POLITICAL THEORY
185
constructive stage, culminates in the publicatio